Air Purifiers Review – 5 Key Factors Model
reiview of ionic air purifiers - ionic air purifier review - air purifiers - best consumer reviews -
Previously we had 4 key factors but now it is the 5 Key Factors Model. With reference to our preceding post, we have now included Scientific Peer Review as the fifth key factor in our air purifier review model.
Our analysis [highlights]|indicate]|enquiries [highlight]|studies [highlight] that the paucity of scientific peer reviews is a oversized setback to all the interested parties in assenting with the claims of air purifier manufacturers, regardless of how credible the latter may be. Interested parties include the scientific community such as indoor air quality specialists, environmentalists (both academics and activists), government agencies like the US EPA and NIOSH, the medical community who specialised in allergy issues etc.
It is very vital to note that this impediment is not limited only to the ionic air purifier industry. Comparable setbacks perturbs all the other technologies in the air purification industry, including the esteemed HEPA and the newer photo-catalytic oxidation methodologies.
It almost seems that, as a basic constituent of any air purifier review, the scientific peer review is comparable to the holy grail of the air purifier industry. Any fortunate manufacturer who gets it first will command the same mythical control in the multimillion dollar industry.
Given the extreme (no exaggeration here!) importance of a scientific peer review, the biggest mystery is why no one has deemed it worth their effort to embark upon a single review. It is understandable that no air purifier manufacturer has commissioned one since that would void the independence element that is central to a scientific peer review.
What is puzzling is why no scientist or researcher, notably those in the indoor air quality or environmental sciences disciplines who would seem the most trained to write an air purifier review, considers it worthwhile to do. There are droves of talented scientists expounding on indoor air quality all over the world. Do none believe in prevailing air purification technologies enough to provide end consumers with an independent peer review? It cannot be. As a matter of fact, we know that funding is available from the US NIOSH. They are ready to fund anyone who can deliver a proficient scientific peer review.
Why is there no scientist or researcher willing to plunge into an objective scientific peer review? It begs the million dollar question – is the air purification industry one big hype? One other possibility is that scientists view proving air purification technology as chasing the Holy Grail – a futile pursuit for those with limitless resources? In fact, we have trouble even finding a single comprehensive objective air purifier review.
These highly stimulating questions drive us to greater scrutiny with our 5-Key Factors Model. Our despatch, to several air purifier manufacturers, of a detailed survey based on our model met with muted response. But this only piques us to delve deeper.
To recap, the Air Purifier Review – 5 Key Factors Model is as detailed:
(1) Safety – in relation to the reactive agent
(2) Safety – in relation to unintended by-products
(3) Efficacy – the reactive agents work in the lab
(4) Efficiency – the reactive agents work in the real world
(5) Scientific Peer Review.
Each factor of our air purifier review model has been explained fully in separate Ezine articles which you can read via the widget on our blog. Several thousands of our readers have also published our Ezine write-ups for their own subscriber base. If you have not read or published the complete collection of 5, you are welcomed to.
Also, please sign up at our blog as well as we will soon publish our first product review based on the Air Purifier Review – 5 Key Factors Model.
Popular Incoming Search Queries
- reiview of ionic air purifiers
- ionic air purifier review
- air purifiers - best consumer reviews
- fibroidclear - independent reviews
- http://www.ionic-airpurifiers.com
